People v. Miller

272 A.D.2d 925, 708 N.Y.S.2d 779, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5276
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct on summation. We disagree. The record fails to establish that defendant was prejudiced when the prosecutor pointed his finger at defendant during summation (see, People v Duvall, 260 AD2d 183,184, lv denied 93 NY2d 924). Furthermore, the prosecutor’s question, “Why do you bring a knife at 11:00 at night to get delmonico steaks?” falls within the broad scope of rhetorical comment permitted on summation (see generally, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 399). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the prosecutor did not specifically call defendant a thief (cf, People v Stewart, 92 AD2d 226, 230-231). To the extent that the prosecutor’s comments on summation were inappropriate, they were not so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35, 36-37, affd 65 NY2d 837). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 272 A.D.2d 925, 708 N.Y.S.2d 779, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 925 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williamson
77 A.D.3d 1183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)