People v. Miller

266 A.D.2d 241, 696 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11062
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D.2d 787

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), rendered May 2, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and a statement made to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statement (see, People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210; People v Thornton, 238 AD2d 33). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 266 A.D.2d 241, 696 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 241 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. De Bour
352 N.E.2d 562 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Hollman
79 N.Y.2d 181 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Thornton
238 A.D.2d 33 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)