People v. Miller
Opinions
Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: On this record we cannot determine whether defendant would have been successful if his counsel had made a speedy trial motion (see, CPL 30.30). Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, because of defense counsel’s failure to make a motion to dismiss the indictment for noncompliance with the statutory speedy trial requirement, may properly be the subject of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) (see, People v Williams, 140 AD2d 969).
All concur, except Callahan, J. P., who dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the indictment in the following memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
142 A.D.2d 970 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.