People v. Miller

142 A.D.2d 970, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14999
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 1988·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: On this record we cannot determine whether defendant would have been successful if his counsel had made a speedy trial motion (see, CPL 30.30). Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, because of defense counsel’s failure to make a motion to dismiss the indictment for noncompliance with the statutory speedy trial requirement, may properly be the subject of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) (see, People v Williams, 140 AD2d 969).

All concur, except Callahan, J. P., who dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the indictment in the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 142 A.D.2d 970, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

142 A.D.2d 970 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Manning
52 A.D.3d 1295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Wooten
283 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Stephens
181 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Peopl v. Jackson
172 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)