People v. Miller
866 N.E.2d 1041, 8 N.Y.3d 937
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 N.Y.3d 295 →
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant’s argument that he did not receive a hearing in accordance with due process of law is unpreserved for our review. We do not accept defendant’s contention that the error here, if any, constitutes a mode of proceedings error.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Miller, 866 N.E.2d 1041, 8 N.Y.3d 937 (N.Y. 2007).
866 N.E.2d 1041 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.