People v. Miller

175 N.E.2d 457, 9 N.Y.2d 839
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 20, 1961·Published

Opinion

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.-

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Froessel dissents and votes to reverse on the ground that, upon this record and in light of defendant’s written statement, the trial court’s failure to charge the jury that it might find that the underlying felony had been abandoned was prejudicial error (People v. Walsh, 262 N. Y. 140; People v. Smith, 232 N. Y. 239; People v. Brown, 5 A D 2d 819; see, also, People v. Koerber, 244 N. Y. 147, 154; People v. Van Zandt, 224 N. Y. 354); accordingly, a new trial should be ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 175 N.E.2d 457, 9 N.Y.2d 839 (N.Y. 1961).

175 N.E.2d 457 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Smith
133 N.E. 574 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
People v. . Van Zandt
120 N.E. 726 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
People v. Walsh
186 N.E. 422 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
People v. Koerber
155 N.E. 79 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)