People v. Miller
6 P. 99, 66 Cal. 468, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 472
Opinion
In this case it is contended that the complaining witness, a boy thirteen years old, was an accomplice, whose testimony required corroboration; and as he was not corroborated, the conviction of the defendant was erroneous. But the uncontradicted testimony of the boy shows that he acted under the threats and coercion of the defendant. He was, therefore, not an accomplice; and as the evidence in the case was sufficient to sustain the verdict, the judgment and order must be affirmed. It is so ordered.
Rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Miller, 6 P. 99, 66 Cal. 468, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 472 (Cal. 1885).
6 P. 99 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harold Hutson v. United States
238 F.2d 167 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
People v. Battilana
126 P.2d 923 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Perryman v. State
12 S.E.2d 388 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
State v. Weston
219 P. 180 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1923)
Arp v. State
97 Ala. 5 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)