People v. Millard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Millard

241 A.D.2d 567, 659 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 567 (People v. Millard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Millard, 241 A.D.2d 567, 659 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered June 8, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree.

After pleading guilty to attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 6V2 to 13 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively. Given defendant’s criminal history and the fact that the sentence was in accordance with the plea agreement, we reject defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed for attempted robbery in the first degree was harsh and excessive (see, People v Buchicchio, 116 AD2d 729, lv denied 67 NY2d 940).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered June 8, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree.

After pleading guilty to attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 6V2 to 13 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively. Given defendant’s criminal history and the fact that the sentence was in accordance with the plea agreement, we reject defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed for attempted robbery in the first degree was harsh and excessive (see, People v Buchicchio, 116 AD2d 729, lv denied 67 NY2d 940).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D.2d 567, 659 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-millard-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack