People v. Millan

271 A.D.2d 620, 707 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Millan. Read the opinion of the Court — 295 A.D.2d 267

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered July 3, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[621]*621Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Antonio, 255 AD2d 449), and in any event, is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Millan, 271 A.D.2d 620, 707 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

271 A.D.2d 620 (People v. Millan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Antonio
255 A.D.2d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)