People v. Miles
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 05995 (People v. Miles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Miles |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 05995 |
| Decided on November 27, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 27, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JANICE A. TAYLOR
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.
2022-10466
v
Shabar Miles, appellant. Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Katheryne M. Martone of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Davis Cao of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Joseph E. Gubbay, J.), entered December 9, 2022, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant appeals from his designation as a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), contending only that the Supreme Court should not have assessed him 15 points under risk factor 11 of the risk assessment instrument for a history of drug abuse.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the People established that he had a history of drug abuse by clear and convincing evidence, including his admissions in pre-sentence interviews in 2010 and 2016 that he used marijuana daily, his receipt of three disciplinary violations while incarcerated for violating urinalysis tests, his treatment for substance abuse while incarcerated, and his diagnosis of cannabis use disorder and phencyclidine use disorder (see People v Vasquez, 197 AD3d 1185, 1186; People v Yglesias, 180 AD3d 821, 822; People v Nieves, 179 AD3d 849).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.
LASALLE, P.J., CHAMBERS, TAYLOR and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 05995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-miles-nyappdiv-2024.