People v. Mildwoff
This text of 49 A.D.2d 521 (People v. Mildwoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on January 9, 1975, affirmed. Concur—Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.; Markewich, J. P., and Capozzoli, J., dissent in the following memorandum by Markewich, J. P.:—There is no doubt whatever that defendant-appellant requires psychiatric treatment. The bizarre nature of the sexual indignities visited upon his victim should point to such a conclusion. Moreover, at sentence, the court recognized the need in so many words. And yet there was no referral for a psychiatric evaluation. This seems to me to have been an abuse of discretion so grave as to be a matter of law. I would vacate the sentence and remand for resentence after consideration of an appropriate report.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A.D.2d 521, 373 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mildwoff-nyappdiv-1975.