People v. Mildwoff

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Mildwoff

352 N.E.2d 131, 39 N.Y.2d 856, 386 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2805

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 2, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 N.E.2d 131 (People v. Mildwoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mildwoff, 352 N.E.2d 131, 39 N.Y.2d 856, 386 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2805 (N.Y. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

It cannot be said on this record that the failure of the trial court to order a psychiatric report prior to the imposition of sentence constituted an abuse of discretion as a matter of law. We also conclude that there was sufficient corroborative evidence to sustain this conviction of sexual abuse.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

It cannot be said on this record that the failure of the trial court to order a psychiatric report prior to the imposition of sentence constituted an abuse of discretion as a matter of law. We also conclude that there was sufficient corroborative evidence to sustain this conviction of sexual abuse.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

352 N.E.2d 131, 39 N.Y.2d 856, 386 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mildwoff-ny-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack