People v. Miele

30 A.D.2d 539, 291 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4089
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 6, 1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 18, 1967, dismissed. An order denying a motion for resentence is not appealable (People v. Holmes, 27 A D 2d 843). Further, coram nobis is not a proper remedy to raise the question of an improperly accepted guilty plea where the facts giving rise to such claim appear on the face of the record (see People v. Sadness, 300 N. Y. 69). In any event, if the merits of defendant’s claim were properly before us,, we would hold that his version of the circumstances surrounding the commission of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, to which he offered to plead guilty, did establish his guilt thereof (cf. People v. Serrano, 15 N Y 2d 304). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miele, 30 A.D.2d 539, 291 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4089 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 539 (People v. Miele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Flushing Hospital & Medical Center
122 Misc. 2d 260 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1983)