People v. Miekeljohn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Miekeljohn

131 A.D.2d 512, 516 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47965

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 131 A.D.2d 512 (People v. Miekeljohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Miekeljohn, 131 A.D.2d 512, 516 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (O’Brien, J.), rendered April 1, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On this appeal the defendant claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and sets forth several alleged errors committed by his trial counsel. It is apparent from the record, however, that defense counsel’s decisions were strategically motivated. The fact that trial defense counsel’s tactics were unsuccessful does not, in and of itself, demonstrate the ineffective assistance of counsel (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796; People v Outler, 118 AD2d 819). The record, viewed in its entirety, reveals that the defendant was afforded meaningful and effective representation. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (O’Brien, J.), rendered April 1, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On this appeal the defendant claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and sets forth several alleged errors committed by his trial counsel. It is apparent from the record, however, that defense counsel’s decisions were strategically motivated. The fact that trial defense counsel’s tactics were unsuccessful does not, in and of itself, demonstrate the ineffective assistance of counsel (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796; People v Outler, 118 AD2d 819). The record, viewed in its entirety, reveals that the defendant was afforded meaningful and effective representation. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.2d 512, 516 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-miekeljohn-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack