People v. Middleton

904 N.E.2d 499, 12 N.Y.3d 737
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 2009·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs.

Defendant’s constitutional arguments are unpreserved. The record supports the determination of the courts below that defendant is a level three sex offender.

Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Middleton, 904 N.E.2d 499, 12 N.Y.3d 737 (N.Y. 2009).

904 N.E.2d 499 (People v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wilkinson
2025 NY Slip Op 06631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Strong
2021 NY Slip Op 04567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
WOLLEK, MICHAEL J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Wollek
122 A.D.3d 1388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Duart
84 A.D.3d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Larkin
66 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Teagle
64 A.D.3d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)