People v. Middleton

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Middleton

904 N.E.2d 499, 12 N.Y.3d 737

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 17, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 904 N.E.2d 499 (People v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Middleton, 904 N.E.2d 499, 12 N.Y.3d 737 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs.

Defendant’s constitutional arguments are unpreserved. The record supports the determination of the courts below that defendant is a level three sex offender.

Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI