People v. Mickens

238 A.D.2d 527, 657 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3982
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mickens. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 A.D.2d 543

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered April 19, 1995, convicting him of endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that he was denied a fair trial by the trial court’s charge to the jury on the elements of endangering the welfare of a child is not preserved for appellate review since he did not object to the charge as given (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10). Under the circumstances of this case we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mickens, 238 A.D.2d 527, 657 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

238 A.D.2d 527 (People v. Mickens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)