People v. Michalska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Michalska

123 A.D.3d 456, 996 N.Y.S.2d 201

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2014

Docket4605/09 -2315/10 13683 5597/10 13682 13681

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.3d 456 (People v. Michalska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Michalska, 123 A.D.3d 456, 996 N.Y.S.2d 201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about February 2, 2012, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentences not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about February 2, 2012, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentences not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter and Clark, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.3d 456, 996 N.Y.S.2d 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-michalska-nyappdiv-2014.