People v. Micciulli

129 P.3d 87, 2006 Colo. LEXIS 147, 2006 WL 389854
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided February 21, 2006·No. No. 05SA290·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Interlocutory Appeal, Justice Hobbs, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that the trial court ruling granting the defendant’s motion to suppress should be affirmed; whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Rice, and Justice Coats are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the trial court ruling granting the defendant’s motion to suppress is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 35(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Micciulli, 129 P.3d 87, 2006 Colo. LEXIS 147, 2006 WL 389854 (Colo. 2006).

129 P.3d 87 (People v. Micciulli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.