People v. Meyers

190 A.D.2d 1098, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1422
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Meyers. Read the opinion of the Court — 204 A.D.2d 492

Opinion

— Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature (see, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Jacobsen, 170 AD2d 1043). Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Meyers, 190 A.D.2d 1098, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 1098 (People v. Meyers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. DiPiazza
248 N.E.2d 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Jacobsen
170 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)