Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Meyers

People v. Meyers

190 A.D.2d 1098, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1422
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 1098 (People v. Meyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Meyers, 190 A.D.2d 1098, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

— Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature (see, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Jacobsen, 170 AD2d 1043). Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. DiPiazza
248 N.E.2d 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Jacobsen
170 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 A.D.2d 1098, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-meyers-nyappdiv-1993.