People v. Meyerowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Meyerowitz

92 A.D.2d 942, 460 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.2d 942 (People v. Meyerowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Meyerowitz, 92 A.D.2d 942, 460 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a f sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed August 17,1982, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance 1 in the fifth degree, on a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate I term of imprisonment of one to three years. Sentence modified, as a matter of I discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a term of 60 days’ , imprisonment and five years’ probation. The sentence of imprisonment shall 5 be a condition of and shall run concurrently with the sentence of probation. As t so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a f sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed August 17,1982, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance 1 in the fifth degree, on a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate I term of imprisonment of one to three years. Sentence modified, as a matter of I discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a term of 60 days’ , imprisonment and five years’ probation. The sentence of imprisonment shall 5 be a condition of and shall run concurrently with the sentence of probation. As t so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 942, 460 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-meyerowitz-nyappdiv-1983.