People v. Meyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Meyer

282 A.D.2d 621, 723 N.Y.S.2d 386, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3751

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 621 (People v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Meyer, 282 A.D.2d 621, 723 N.Y.S.2d 386, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered July 2, 1998, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, vehicular manslaughter in the second degree, and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted with the requisite culpable mental state to support the convictions of manslaughter in the second degree and vehicular manslaughter in the second degree. The defendant further contends that the People failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he was intoxicated. Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the convictions. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered July 2, 1998, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, vehicular manslaughter in the second degree, and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted with the requisite culpable mental state to support the convictions of manslaughter in the second degree and vehicular manslaughter in the second degree. The defendant further contends that the People failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he was intoxicated. Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the convictions. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 621, 723 N.Y.S.2d 386, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-meyer-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack