People v. Meyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Meyer

15 A.D.2d 649, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11831

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Meyer. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 A.D.2d 241 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 25, 1962·Published

Opinion

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed on the law [650]*650and on the facts. Each ease rests on its own facts, and while the proof somewhat parallels that in People v. Hederman (10 A D 2d 684) there are significant distinctions. The testimony of the man who was served while in an intoxicated condition, though offered to bolster defendant’s denials, had the opposite effect. This testimony alone distinguishes the ease, from our prior cited decision. Concur—Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed on the law [650]*650and on the facts. Each ease rests on its own facts, and while the proof somewhat parallels that in People v. Hederman (10 A D 2d 684) there are significant distinctions. The testimony of the man who was served while in an intoxicated condition, though offered to bolster defendant’s denials, had the opposite effect. This testimony alone distinguishes the ease, from our prior cited decision. Concur—Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

People v. Meyer, 15 A.D.2d 649, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

15 A.D.2d 649 (People v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.