People v. Metzger

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 5, 2026
Docket295 KA 23-01468
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Metzger (People v. Metzger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Metzger, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Metzger - 2026 NY Slip Op 03556
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Metzger

2026 NY Slip Op 03556

June 5, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

CHRISTION METZGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on June 5, 2026

295 KA 23-01468

Present: Lindley, J.P., Curran, Ogden, Nowak, And Delconte, JJ.

TINA L. HARTWELL, PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (DAVID A. COOKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TODD C. CARVILLE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (MICHAEL A. LABELLA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Robert Bauer, J.), rendered March 17, 2023. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and attempted assault in the first degree.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a guilty plea, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and attempted assault in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 120.10 [1]). We affirm. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v John, 244 AD3d 1782, 1782 [4th Dept 2025]; People v Reed, 244 AD3d 1815, 1815 [4th Dept 2025]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 564-566 [2019], cert denied 589 US 1302 [2020]), we conclude that defendant's sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: June 5, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Metzger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-metzger-nyappdiv-2026.