People v. Mess

2020 NY Slip Op 4671, 127 N.Y.S.3d 360, 186 A.D.3d 1069
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 20, 2020
Docket400 KA 16-02127
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 4671 (People v. Mess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mess, 2020 NY Slip Op 4671, 127 N.Y.S.3d 360, 186 A.D.3d 1069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Mess (2020 NY Slip Op 04671)
People v Mess
2020 NY Slip Op 04671
Decided on August 20, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 20, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

400 KA 16-02127

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

CHARLENE M. MESS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


NORMAN P. EFFMAN, PUBLIC DEFENDER, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, BATAVIA (WENDY EVANS LEHMANN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Michael M. Mohun, J.), rendered June 23, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant upon her plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]). We reject defendant's contention that her waiver of the right to appeal was invalid. The plea colloquy establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Inasmuch as defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal specifically included a waiver of the right to challenge the severity of the sentence and defendant was informed of the maximum sentence County Court could impose in its discretion, the waiver encompasses her challenge to the severity of her sentence (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Lasher, 151 AD3d 1774, 1775 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1129 [2017]).

Entered: August 20, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Thomas
2024 NY Slip Op 00547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Szymanski
2023 NY Slip Op 03131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Austin
2022 NY Slip Op 03848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Witherow
2022 NY Slip Op 01691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Roots
158 N.Y.S.3d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Cossette
2021 NY Slip Op 06285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 4671, 127 N.Y.S.3d 360, 186 A.D.3d 1069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mess-nyappdiv-2020.