People v. Merrihew

9 A.D.2d 981, 195 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5295
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of conviction of County Court, Ulster County. The record as now settled by the Trial Judge does not show defendant’s presence before the court when the additional instructions were given by the court to the jury, and we infer from the proceedings taken [982] on settlement of the record that he was not then present. (Code Grim. Pro., § 427; People v. Silver, 234 App. Div. 871.) On the new trial the question whether the exhibit offered in evidence was an “ instrument or weapon ” of the “ kind commonly known as a blackjack ” (Penal Law, § 1897, subd. 1) should be specifically submitted to the jury as a fact question, as well as the question whether, aided by the statutory presumption, the People had established as a fact defendant’s possession of the instrument by showing it was in the trunk of his car. Judgment reversed on the law and facts and new trial ordered. Poster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Merrihew, 9 A.D.2d 981, 195 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

9 A.D.2d 981 (People v. Merrihew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
122 Misc. 2d 716 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1984)