People v. Merrifield

266 A.D.2d 922, 698 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11745
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 12, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 A.D.2d 922 (People v. Merrifield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Merrifield, 266 A.D.2d 922, 698 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that the plea colloquy is insufficient because County Court failed to advise him of his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination or his constitutional right to confront his accusers (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16-19). The record establishes that defendant’s guilty plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, supra, at 19-21). (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Hurl-butt and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Davenport
273 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 922, 698 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-merrifield-nyappdiv-1999.