People v. Mercy

223 A.D.3d 686, 201 N.Y.S.3d 243, 2024 NY Slip Op 00088
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2024
DocketInd. No. 57/21
StatusPublished

This text of 223 A.D.3d 686 (People v. Mercy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mercy, 223 A.D.3d 686, 201 N.Y.S.3d 243, 2024 NY Slip Op 00088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Mercy (2024 NY Slip Op 00088)
People v Mercy
2024 NY Slip Op 00088
Decided on January 10, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 10, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LARA J. GENOVESI
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.

2021-09465
(Ind. No. 57/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Dennis J. Mercy, appellant.


Margaret M. Walker, Poughkeepsie, NY (Seth Gallagher of counsel), for appellant.

Anthony P. Parisi, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Amie M. Johnson and Kieran Linehan of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered November 17, 2021, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal as part of his plea agreement (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248), and that the appeal waiver was not unilaterally imposed by the County Court (cf. People v Sutton, 184 AD3d 236). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Stevens, 203 AD3d 958).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, GENOVESI and VENTURA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Sutton
2020 NY Slip Op 3400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Stevens
203 A.D.3d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 A.D.3d 686, 201 N.Y.S.3d 243, 2024 NY Slip Op 00088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mercy-nyappdiv-2024.