People v. Mercer

69 A.D.3d 960, 892 N.Y.2d 784
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, except to the extent that the alleged ineffective assistance involved the voluntariness of his plea (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Opoku, 61 AD3d 705 [2009]). To the extent that the defendant is claiming that the ineffective assistance of counsel rendered his plea involuntary, the record reveals that the defendant received an advantageous plea, and nothing in the record casts doubt on the effectiveness of counsel (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397 [1995]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]; People v Gallo, 54 AD3d 964 [2008]; People v Boodhoo, 191 AD2d 448 [1993]). Dillon, J.E, Miller, Eng, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mercer, 69 A.D.3d 960, 892 N.Y.2d 784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

69 A.D.3d 960 (People v. Mercer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Perez
83 A.D.3d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Aguayo
73 A.D.3d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)