People v. Mercer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mercer

213 A.D.2d 164, 624 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2341

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 164 (People v. Mercer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mercer, 213 A.D.2d 164, 624 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered August 11, 1992, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 12Vi to 25 years on the rape and sodomy charges, to be served consecutively to a term of 8 to 16 years on the robbery charge, unanimously affirmed.

The record on direct appeal fails to support defendant’s claim he failed to receive effective assistance of counsel (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). In view of defendant’s past criminal record, we perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing (People v Junco, 43 AD2d 266, affd 35 NY2d 419, cert denied 421 US 951). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Ross, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered August 11, 1992, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 12Vi to 25 years on the rape and sodomy charges, to be served consecutively to a term of 8 to 16 years on the robbery charge, unanimously affirmed.

The record on direct appeal fails to support defendant’s claim he failed to receive effective assistance of counsel (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). In view of defendant’s past criminal record, we perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing (People v Junco, 43 AD2d 266, affd 35 NY2d 419, cert denied 421 US 951). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Ross, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 164, 624 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mercer-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack