People v. Mercado

2025 NY Slip Op 05105
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 24, 2025·No. Ind. No. 70138/20·Published

Opinion

People v Mercado (2025 NY Slip Op 05105)

People v Mercado
2025 NY Slip Op 05105
Decided on September 24, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 24, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
CARL J. LANDICINO
PHILLIP HOM, JJ.

2023-03857
(Ind. No. 70138/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Matthew L. Mercado, appellant.


Matthew Christiana, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Cynthia Dolan of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (William L. DeProspo, J.), imposed February 22, 2023, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bolton, 235 AD3d 995; People v Young, 225 AD3d 903). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256).

BARROS, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, DOWLING, LANDICINO and HOM, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mercado, 2025 NY Slip Op 05105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

2025 NY Slip Op 05105 (People v. Mercado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)