People v. Mercado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mercado

259 A.D.2d 635, 684 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2453

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 635 (People v. Mercado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mercado, 259 A.D.2d 635, 684 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered July 30, 1997, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered July 30, 1997, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 635, 684 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mercado-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack