People v. Menter
This text of 166 A.D.2d 920 (People v. Menter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports the court’s finding that the victim’s pretrial identification of defendant from a photographic array was not impermissibly suggestive. Defendant’s remaining contentions were not preserved for review and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Oswego County Court, Auser, J.— sodomy, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Den-man, Green and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 A.D.2d 920, 561 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-menter-nyappdiv-1990.