People v. Mendoza

7 A.D.3d 642, 776 N.Y.S.2d 501, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6900
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J), rendered July 2, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly admitted evidence of the defendant’s prior uncharged crimes (see People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233 [1987]; People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350 [1981]; People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 [1901]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Santucci, J.E, Krausman, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mendoza, 7 A.D.3d 642, 776 N.Y.S.2d 501, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 642 (People v. Mendoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
27 A.D.3d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)