People v. Mendoza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mendoza

109 A.D.2d 895, 487 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47418

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.2d 895 (People v. Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mendoza, 109 A.D.2d 895, 487 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sangiorgio, J.), rendered May 3, 1982, as convicted him of criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposed sentence.

Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from.

The evidence adduced by the People was sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find, as did the jury at bar, that defendant knowingly and unlawfully possessed “substances of an aggregate weight of more than sixteen ounces containing marihuana” (Penal Law § 221.25; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; see also, People v Barnes, 50 NY2d 375, 381; cf. People v Rodriguez, 104 AD2d 832, 834). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sangiorgio, J.), rendered May 3, 1982, as convicted him of criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposed sentence.

Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from.

The evidence adduced by the People was sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find, as did the jury at bar, that defendant knowingly and unlawfully possessed “substances of an aggregate weight of more than sixteen ounces containing marihuana” (Penal Law § 221.25; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; see also, People v Barnes, 50 NY2d 375, 381; cf. People v Rodriguez, 104 AD2d 832, 834). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 895, 487 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mendoza-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack