People v. Mendoza
110 A.D.2d 570, 489 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48482
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 23, 1985·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[571] Defendant was convicted of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and seventh degrees. However, as the People concede, criminal possession in the seventh degree is a lesser inclusory offense which, under the circumstances herein, should have been dismissed pursuant to CPL 300.40 (3) (b). (See, People v Evans, 70 AD2d 816.) Concur. — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Mendoza, 110 A.D.2d 570, 489 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 570 (People v. Mendoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. McKenzie
131 A.D.2d 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Williams
129 A.D.2d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Holman
117 A.D.2d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)