People v. Mendez

142 A.D.3d 510, 35 N.Y.S.3d 924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 3, 2016·No. 2012-08034·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defend-

ant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed May 8, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

*511 Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Hobson, 131 AD3d 546, 546 [2015]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Austin, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mendez, 142 A.D.3d 510, 35 N.Y.S.3d 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 510 (People v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mendez
28 N.Y.3d 1029 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)