People v. Mena

237 A.D.2d 464, 655 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mena. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 A.D.2d 147

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered October 16, 1995, convicting him of illegal possession of a vehicle identification number, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence supporting his conviction for illegal possession of a vehicle identification number was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Tallarine, 223 AD2d 738). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mena, 237 A.D.2d 464, 655 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 464 (People v. Mena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Tallarine
223 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)