People v. Melville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Melville

54 A.D.2d 742, 387 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14376

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 742 (People v. Melville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Melville, 54 A.D.2d 742, 387 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 19, 1975, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term with a maximum of 15 years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the maximum period of imprisonment to 12 years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Upon the argument of this appeal, defendant stated that the only issue to be determined was whether the indeterminate sentence of 15 years should be reduced to 12 years. It should be. On October 22, 1974 defendant pleaded guilty to a single count of manslaughter in the ñrst degree with a promise by the court that it would impose a maximum sentence of 12 years. On December 17, 1974, and over the objection of defense counsel, the court vacated the plea and referred the case to Part 1 to be assigned to another Judge for trial. Before the latter Judge, a plea to manslaughter in the second degree was accepted and, without an updated presentence report, defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term with a maximum of 15 years. In our opinion defendant, upon taking a plea to a lesser crime, should not have not been given a heavier sentence than he was to receive upon his plea to the greater offense. We have therefore reduced the sentence accordingly. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 19, 1975, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term with a maximum of 15 years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the maximum period of imprisonment to 12 years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Upon the argument of this appeal, defendant stated that the only issue to be determined was whether the indeterminate sentence of 15 years should be reduced to 12 years. It should be. On October 22, 1974 defendant pleaded guilty to a single count of manslaughter in the ñrst degree with a promise by the court that it would impose a maximum sentence of 12 years. On December 17, 1974, and over the objection of defense counsel, the court vacated the plea and referred the case to Part 1 to be assigned to another Judge for trial. Before the latter Judge, a plea to manslaughter in the second degree was accepted and, without an updated presentence report, defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term with a maximum of 15 years. In our opinion defendant, upon taking a plea to a lesser crime, should not have not been given a heavier sentence than he was to receive upon his plea to the greater offense. We have therefore reduced the sentence accordingly. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 742, 387 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-melville-nyappdiv-1976.