People v. Melovicz
192 N.W. 562, 221 Mich. 620, 1923 Mich. LEXIS 509
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law and was sentenced in the alternative to pay a fine of $250 or to be confined in the Detroit house of correction for a period of 60 days. He paid the fine' and thereafter sued out this writ of error. In the recent case of People v. Ortwski, 220 Mich. 462, a similar situation was presented. We there held that the judgment having been satisfied by voluntary payment, the writ of error performed no function. That case is controlling here.. The writ of error must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Melovicz, 192 N.W. 562, 221 Mich. 620, 1923 Mich. LEXIS 509 (Mich. 1923).
192 N.W. 562 (People v. Melovicz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Carey
160 N.W.2d 799 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1968)
City of Denison v. McCord
105 N.W.2d 485 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1960)
Duncan v. State
58 A.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1948)
State v. Osborne
54 A.2d 526 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1947)
Thomas v. Montcalm Circuit Judge
199 N.W. 610 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1923)