People v. Mehia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mehia

264 A.D.2d 676, 695 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9506

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 676 (People v. Mehia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mehia, 264 A.D.2d 676, 695 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J., at plea; Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J., at sentence), rendered January 26, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him to a term of 2½ to 7½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his claim that the court improperly enhanced his sentence for his failure to appear at sentencing and his subsequent arrest for, and conviction of, another crime and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, we perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J., at plea; Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J., at sentence), rendered January 26, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him to a term of 2½ to 7½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his claim that the court improperly enhanced his sentence for his failure to appear at sentencing and his subsequent arrest for, and conviction of, another crime and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, we perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 676, 695 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mehia-nyappdiv-1999.