People v. Meers

15 A.D.2d 876, 225 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11339

This text of 15 A.D.2d 876 (People v. Meers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Meers, 15 A.D.2d 876, 225 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Memorandum:

We have passed upon the very question that is here

presented in People ex rel. Meers v. Martin (4 A D 2d 659, affd. 4 N Y 2d 898). The only distinction is that the former appeal was from an order sustaining a writ of habeas corpus, and this is a request to appeal as a poor person in coram nobis. However, the procedural differences would not in any way affect our decision upon the facts, and further, as no jiu’is¿fictional question is presented [877]*877involving facts dehors the record, coram nobis does not lie. We have already decided all of the questions which could be presented on appeal if permission were granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 876, 225 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-meers-nyappdiv-1962.