People v. Mee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mee

183 N.Y.S.3d 913, 2023 NY Slip Op 01408

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 2023·No. 172 KA 20-00290·Published

Opinion

People v Mee (2023 NY Slip Op 01408)

People v Mee

2023 NY Slip Op 01408

Decided on March 17, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 17, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

172 KA 20-00290

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ALBERT D. MEE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (LEAH N. FARWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAMES B. RITTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered August 23, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not foreclose his challenge to the severity of the negotiated sentence. The People correctly concede that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because County Court provided defendant with erroneous information about the scope of the waiver and failed to identify that certain rights would survive the waiver (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Harrison, 195 AD3d 1452, 1452 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 992 [2021]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: March 17, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v Mee (2023 NY Slip Op 01408)

People v Mee

2023 NY Slip Op 01408

Decided on March 17, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 17, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

172 KA 20-00290

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ALBERT D. MEE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (LEAH N. FARWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAMES B. RITTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered August 23, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not foreclose his challenge to the severity of the negotiated sentence. The People correctly concede that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because County Court provided defendant with erroneous information about the scope of the waiver and failed to identify that certain rights would survive the waiver (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Harrison, 195 AD3d 1452, 1452 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 992 [2021]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: March 17, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

People v. Mee, 183 N.Y.S.3d 913, 2023 NY Slip Op 01408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

183 N.Y.S.3d 913 (People v. Mee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related