People v. Medina
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on or about June 20, 2012, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate a judgment of conviction rendered February 22, 1991, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion without holding a hearing (see People v Samandarov, 13 NY3d 433, 439-440 [2009]). Padilla v Kentucky (559 US 356 [2010]), requiring counsel to advise a defendant of the immigration [583]*583consequences of entering a guilty plea, is not accorded retroactive effect (People v Baret, 23 NY3d 777 [2014]). To the extent that defendant’s moving papers may be read to assert that he was given misleading advice, his failure to specify the allegedly erroneous advice, by setting forth sufficient factual allegations to support his claim is fatal to his application (CPL 440.30 [1] [a]; see People v Simpson, 120 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1046 [2014]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
129 A.D.3d 582 (People v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.