People v. Medina

1 A.D.3d 201, 767 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11916

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.), rendered November 20, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not establish a proper foundation for impeach[202] ing the arresting officer by means of a purported prior inconsistent statement contained in a prisoner property form (see People v Wise, 46 NY2d 321, 326 [1978]; People v Duncan, 46 NY2d 74, 80-81 [1978], cert denied 442 US 910 [1979]). Accordingly, there was no violation of defendant’s right to confront witnesses (see Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 678-679 [1986]). Defendant’s argument that the document also qualified as a business record is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Concur—Saxe, J.P, Rosenberger, Williams, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Medina, 1 A.D.3d 201, 767 N.Y.S.2d 216, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

1 A.D.3d 201 (People v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delaware v. Van Arsdall
475 U.S. 673 (Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Duncan
385 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Wise
385 N.E.2d 1262 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)