People v. Medina

283 A.D.2d 250, 724 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5109
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 2001·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Bernstein, J.), entered on or about September 28, 2000, which granted the People’s motion for reconsideration, and upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision, entered on or about June 23, 2000, that had dismissed the indictment, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the indictment reinstated.

The motion court erred in dismissing the indictment on the ground that the Grand Jury’s initial failure to vote a true bill constituted a dismissal requiring the People to obtain leave to re-present. The fact that there were neither 12 votes to indict nor 12 votes to dismiss was not the equivalent of a dismissal (People v Foster, 279 AD2d 317). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Medina, 283 A.D.2d 250, 724 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 250 (People v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hutchinson
52 Misc. 3d 433 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2016)
People v. Griffith
20 Misc. 3d 373 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2008)
People v. Morrison
34 A.D.3d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Gordon
13 Misc. 3d 618 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
People v. Aarons
305 A.D.2d 45 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)