People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Medina

280 A.D.2d 556, 720 N.Y.S.2d 395, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1771

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 13, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 280 A.D.2d 556 (People v. Medina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Medina, 280 A.D.2d 556, 720 N.Y.S.2d 395, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), rendered February 11, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[557]*557The Supreme Court properly determined that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant (see, People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417; People v Javier, 175 AD2d 182), and that the defendant’s confessions, which were made after his arrest, were voluntary (see, People v Parris, 83 NY2d 342; People v Rose, 204 AD2d 745).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), rendered February 11, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[557]*557The Supreme Court properly determined that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant (see, People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417; People v Javier, 175 AD2d 182), and that the defendant’s confessions, which were made after his arrest, were voluntary (see, People v Parris, 83 NY2d 342; People v Rose, 204 AD2d 745).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 556, 720 N.Y.S.2d 395, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-medina-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack