People v. Medina

158 A.D.2d 405, 551 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1857

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: February 22, 1990
• Status: Published

Opinion

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Asch, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.