People v. Medart

46 N.E. 1095, 166 Ill. 348
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 11, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 46 N.E. 1095 (People v. Medart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Medart, 46 N.E. 1095, 166 Ill. 348 (Ill. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The questions raised on this record are fully discussed in the foregoing opinion, and we concur with the Appellate Court in what is therein said. The judgment of the Appellate Court for the Fourth District is affiimed.

Judgment affirmed.

Magruder, C. J., and Baker, J.: We do not concur in this opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Randell
298 N.E.2d 735 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1973)
Commissioners of Lincoln Park v. Schmidt
69 N.E.2d 869 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1946)
Illinois Merchants Trust Co. v. Turner
173 N.E. 52 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1930)
Locander v. Joliet & Eastern Traction Co.
225 Ill. App. 143 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
Hastings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
172 S.W. 1016 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1915)
Jackson v. Mulzer
174 Ill. App. 272 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 N.E. 1095, 166 Ill. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-medart-ill-1896.