People v. Meade

2017 NY Slip Op 3534, 150 A.D.3d 764, 51 N.Y.S.3d 423
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 2017·No. 2012-07701·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered July 26, 2012, convicting him of robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel by counsel’s waiver of a pretrial suppression hearing. “There can be no denial of effective assistance of trial counsel arising from counsel’s failure to ‘make a motion . . . that has little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005], quoting People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004]). Here, the record is devoid of any indication that counsel could have presented a colorable argument challenging the legality of the defendant’s arrest (see People v Carver, 27 NY3d 418, 420-421 [2016]).

Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Meade, 2017 NY Slip Op 3534, 150 A.D.3d 764, 51 N.Y.S.3d 423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 3534 (People v. Meade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cardillo (Frank)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019