People v. Meade
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3534 (People v. Meade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered July 26, 2012, convicting him of robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel by counsel’s waiver of a pretrial suppression hearing. “There can be no denial of effective assistance of trial counsel arising from counsel’s failure to ‘make a motion . . . that has little or no chance of success’ ” (People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005], quoting People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004]). Here, the record is devoid of any indication that counsel could have presented a colorable argument challenging the legality of the defendant’s arrest (see People v Carver, 27 NY3d 418, 420-421 [2016]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 3534, 150 A.D.3d 764, 51 N.Y.S.3d 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-meade-nyappdiv-2017.