People v. McRae

2021 NY Slip Op 03057, 143 N.Y.S.3d 615, 194 A.D.3d 846
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 12, 2021
DocketInd. No. 10179/16
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03057 (People v. McRae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McRae, 2021 NY Slip Op 03057, 143 N.Y.S.3d 615, 194 A.D.3d 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v McRae (2021 NY Slip Op 03057)
People v McRae
2021 NY Slip Op 03057
Decided on May 12, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 12, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2018-06478
(Ind. No. 10179/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Charles McRae, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miriam Cyrulnik, J.), rendered April 13, 2018, convicting him of criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree and criminal possession of a firearm, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631).

CHAMBERS, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY, LASALLE and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03057, 143 N.Y.S.3d 615, 194 A.D.3d 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcrae-nyappdiv-2021.