People v. McRae

283 A.D.2d 443, 724 N.Y.S.2d 625, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4713
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered November 7, 1996, convicting him of [444]*444robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination must be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., S. Miller, Smith and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McRae, 283 A.D.2d 443, 724 N.Y.S.2d 625, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 443 (People v. McRae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morales v. Greiner
273 F. Supp. 2d 236 (E.D. New York, 2003)