People v. McQuilkin

213 A.D.2d 680, 624 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 680 (People v. McQuilkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McQuilkin, 213 A.D.2d 680, 624 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McGann, J.), rendered June 22, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for an adjournment to secure the attendance of a defense witness. The record indicates that the defendant waited until the last minute to attempt to secure this witness’s presence, and therefore failed to make any showing of a diligent effort to secure this witness beforehand (see, People v Foy, 32 NY2d 473; People v Kaleem, 210 AD2d 257; People v Rodriguez, 188 AD2d 494; People v Moutinho, 146 AD2d 650). In addition, the evidence which the defendant sought to introduce through this witness’s testimony was inadmissible hearsay (see, People v Castro, 174 AD2d 378), and that evidence had already been brought to the attention of the [681]*681jury through the testimony of another witness, cross-examination of witnesses, and during the defendant’s summation (see, People v Johnson, 176 AD2d 269, revd on other grounds 81 NY2d 828; People v Coleman, 114 AD2d 906).

The defendant’s remaining contention does not warrant reversal under the facts of this case. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Degondea
269 A.D.2d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Ward
237 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Ryan
229 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Gambler v. Ellwanger
228 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 A.D.2d 680, 624 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcquilkin-nyappdiv-1995.