People v. McQueen

2017 NY Slip Op 5464, 152 A.D.3d 547, 54 N.Y.S.3d 873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 2017·No. 2014-10912·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Donnelly, J.), imposed June 2, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; People v Black, 144 AD3d 935 [2016]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 138-141 [2014]), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Hall, Austin, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McQueen, 2017 NY Slip Op 5464, 152 A.D.3d 547, 54 N.Y.S.3d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5464 (People v. McQueen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Black
2016 NY Slip Op 7670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)